Print Email RSS RSS  Share del.icio.us Facebook Twitter
Cool Homes
Virtual Matrix for Entertainment, Lighting and Home Control
Home includes 15 video zones and 23 audio zones.
image
n addition to having the flexibility to add audio and video components to their whole-house entertainment system, the owners have the option of wireless touchpanels or hardwired keypads to control their music, video, lights and other equipment.
July 18, 2011 | by Lisa Montgomery

Virtual matrix: It sounds like a great title for a movie. It’s also the term Shane Nevins uses to describe the type of whole-house audio and video system his company, C-IX, recently installed into a 14,000-square-foot residence in Pueblo, Colo. It’s the type of system, Nevins says, that’s ideal for people who don’t want to commit to a certain number of speakers and TVs.

In a home this large, it’s natural to feel the need to put in a slew of TVs and speakers. Just how many, though, and where, is the question. The owners of this house started out with 15 zones of video and 23 zones of audio, but it’s conceivable that they might eventually add a few more, says Nevins.

The NetStreams DigiLinX system was chosen because it won’t lock these tech-cautious homeowners into a set number of inputs and outputs, as do systems comprised of traditional matrix switches, Nevins explains.
A matrix switch might come preconfigured with eight inputs for source components such as Blu-ray players and media servers, and eight outputs to feed eight entertainment zones. It’s a great setup for homeowners who can accurately predict the types of source content they’ll ever want available to them, says Nevins.

For homeowners who are unsure, a system like DigiLinX can provide a sense of relief. “We can add source components one at a time, at different times, by just adding a “module” to the system.
The owners can step into their system module by module, TV by TV, source by source,” says Nevins.

For now, the owners of this home are content with their current lineup of two Vudu receivers, three Dish Network satellite receivers, two Netgear media players and one Samsung Blu-ray player. Content from this assortment of gear can be streamed to any and all video and audio zones.

As with most whole-house audio and video systems, touchpanels provide the owners control over their entertainment components. Instead of requiring them to select a specific source component, though,
Nevins configured the system so all they have to do is touch a button that describes what they want to do in a particular area, like watch TV, rent a movie, or listen to music. The DigiLinX system makes the connection automatically. For example, listen to music cues Pandora (through a) Vudu app, which is a favorite of the homeowners. “It’s a great solution for people who don’t want to have to associate equipment names or brands with their entertainment experience,” says Nevins.


Photography by John Bosley Photography



Lisa Montgomery - Contributing Writer
Lisa Montgomery has been writing about home technology for 15 years, with a focus on the impact of electronics on a modern lifestyle.


IP: One Cable Replaces a Bundle

The DigiLinX system in this home is one of a few audio and video distribution systems that utilize a single Ethernet cable to distribute content to multiple TV and speaker locations. Ethernet is the same type of wire that facilitates a connection to the Internet, so these one-wire systems are often referred to as IP (Internet Protocol)-based. In addition to audio, video and data, Ethernet wiring can send commands from a home control system to lights, thermostats and other devices. Two of the biggest benefits: One wire is easier and faster to install than separate cabling for each type of signal, and web-enabled devices (like an iPhone) can be used to control anything on an IP network.



Article Topics
What's Related
Popular Tags
Social Bookmark   less


Comments (4) Most recent displayed first.
Posted by Shane Nevins  on  08/05/11  at  11:51 PM

Yes, the lighting control is Litetouch; 300+ loads.  The audio/video/control matrix allows for any source to be routed to any peripheral device (ie - display, speaker), and in any combination of each; very cool!  The (2) primary advantages to this architecture over traditional matrix systems like Extron, Key Digital, or Autopatch are: scalability and control.  That 9th zone on a traditional 8x8 matrix becomes a problem because it’s not scalable; this virtual matrix allows us to add sources/peripherals as necessary.  Also, legacy systems almost always require expensive 3rd party control; whereas everything is coupled under the same NetStreams architecture here.  We’ve recently completed a similar commercial project at The Center for American Values in Pueblo, Colorado under the same platform that takes full advantage of these dynamic features.  Live HD cameras in combination with DVD and/or PowerPoint routed through the NetStreams architecture allows the production crew to literally route sources from anywhere to anywhere (inside the facility), in that display locations and/or source locations constantly change, but it’s all plug and play.  The next phase (currently under deployment) leverages these same resources, but over a fiber trunk to (3) floors above the original installation.  As the project develops, anything noteworthy will be documented on our website. http://www.c-ix.com

Posted by Evan  on  07/26/11  at  12:07 PM

Westcojack- it looks like LiteTouch.  Sorry but I don’t know the specs… I prefer Lutron.

Jesus- yes, this type of system allows multiple sources to multiple screens or 1 source to multiple screens or any combination in between.  If you’re looking to get just 1 source to only 2 tvs the most cost effective way to do that would be with an amplified splitter, there are many manufactures who make these including Key Digital, Atlona, Gefen, and more…

Posted by Westcojack  on  07/22/11  at  09:53 AM

Interested in knowing what lighting control system they used and specs?

Posted by Jesus gallardo  on  07/19/11  at  12:27 PM

I just have a question:

I’ve seen that this solution is mostly used having different sources for the different outputs.. but I wonder if is also possible to have 1 source going to 2 different tv screens?

Thank you!



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.