Print Email RSS RSS  Share del.icio.us Facebook Twitter
Value Electronics HDTV Shootout
Plasma and LED TVs face off for the perfect picture.
image
May 21, 2012 | by Grant Clauser

Saturday evening I took a trek to Scarsdale NY to visit Value Electronics and participate in the retailer’s annual HDTV Shootout. The Shootout, now in its 8th year, pits the best flat panel TVs against each other in a battle for image quality.

To keep things fair, Value Electronics’ owner Robert Zohn brings in some of the TV industry’s best to calibrate the sets and run the testing. Zohn then invites guests, including home theater journalists and advanced enthusiasts to take part in the Shootout and help in the scoring of the TVs.  All six sets were calibrated by Kevin Miller of ISF and Tweak TV (you may remember Miller from the Electronic House Calibration Webinar last year), David Mackenzie of HDTV Test in Scotland, Ed Johnson and Dewayne Davis. The calibration team used a variety of software and hardware.

The TV selection seemed a little arbitrary to me. There were three plasmas and three LCD LED sets. Panasonic, Samsung, Elite (Sharp), and LG were the brands. There were no Sony or Toshiba models, nor were there any of the more custom-focused brands such as Runco or Bang and Olufsen (Value Electronics doesn’t sell the latter two brands, but Zohn does sell Sony and Toshiba). Zohn said he selected these because he felt they were the cream of the crop this year. I was a little surprised that Sony’s XBR LED TV wasn’t considered, as it should have easily been able to hold its own in a contest with Samsung and Panasonic LEDs, but it was Zohn’s contest, not mine. There was also no LG LED represented. Even more interesting would have been the inclusion of the OLED TVs that Samsung and LG showed at CES in January, but those sets aren’t yet on the market.

From Team Plasma:
• Panasonic TC-P65VT50
• Samsung PN64E8000
• LG 60PM9700

From Team LED LCD:
• Elite PRO-60X5FD (last year’s shootout winner)
• Samsung UN60ES8000
• Panasonic TC-L47WT50

The Elite TV (manufactured by Sharp) swept the HDTV Shootout last year, beating Panasonic’s VT30 plasma. The Elite was the only repeat visitor because that brand hasn’t yet announced new models (but probably will by CEDIA this year). All the other TVs are new 2012 models. All but the Panasonic LCD (which also happened to be the smallest at 47 inches) were 3D sets, though 3D capability wasn’t considered in the evaluation. Also not considered were the set’s smart TV or other features—including Samsung’s voice and gesture control, which was demonstrated, but not factored into the judging.

After introductions, some great sushi and wine (thanks Robert) and short presentations by representatives for Panasonic, Elite and Samsung, our friendly neighborhood calibrators posted a series of test patterns and content clips. With each new selection, our evening’s guides would point out issues, strengths and curiosities on each of the sets.



Grant Clauser - Technology and Web Editor, Electronic House
Grant Clauser has been covering home electronics for more than 10 years with editorial roles in several consumer and trade magazines. He's done ISF-level damage to hundreds of reviewed products and has had audio training from Home Acoustics Alliance and Sencore. He's also the author of the book The Trouble with Rivers. Follow him on Twitter @geclauser.



Article Topics
What's Related
Popular Tags
Social Bookmark   less


Comments (5) Most recent displayed first.
Posted by Grant Clauser  on  05/23/12  at  01:22 PM

Exactly Ed, if if were that easy to duplicate the perfect picture, TV makers would put one button on the remote to change all the settings at once, and we’d all be done. So far the closest thing to that I’ve seen is THX mode, but it’s still not perfect for all models in all environments.

Posted by Ed Johnson  on  05/23/12  at  01:08 PM

Unfortunatly as good as the sets today do calibrate. The accuracy of using settings between sets of the same model does not wotk out. Just from the standpoint of component cost alone. If you want the inter set accuracy where settings would work from one set to another the component cost that has that level of dependable accuracy would prohibit a set at todays pricepoint.

I cannot speak for the VT50 as it is too new. But back when we had a large # of VT30’s to calibrate we had the ability to save the ISF day/night settings and just dump them into the next set. I did not find one set where I could walk away happy with the measured values. It reached a point where I stopped wasting my time to upload the saved settings and just started from scratch.

Posted by Steve  on  05/23/12  at  12:43 PM

But it’s the nature of a TV that the settings you put on it at 2,000 hours will be different from 10,000 hours, which is why a proper calibration is recommended every 6~12 months IF you want to keep it at calibrated standards.

There’s an IMAX screen close to me that is closed to the public, it is ONLY used to screen privately for IMAX family and friends events. There is an event usually every week-end. The screen and the audio system are calibrated each and every time.

Posted by Grant Clauser  on  05/22/12  at  12:59 PM

@Calvin, if Robert Zohn posts the calibration settings, I’ll pass it on. Unfortunately, the calibrated settings do vary from set to set due to manufacturing inconsistencies and due to the viewing environment. In the case of these tests, we were in completely blacked out rooms, including black ceilings and boarded/taped up (with TV boxes) windows.

Posted by Calvin  on  05/22/12  at  11:38 AM

That’s great but the article would be better if the final settings on the TV of the winners should also be posted.  The true quality in my book would be if there aren’t such a wide variation of the settings in the same model of these TV.



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.