A recent study (2005) conducted by the Imaging Science Foundation (ISF) for the IDC and sponsored by Pioneer Electronics, supports the notion that “burn-in” is temporary. “First, while image retention can occur in modern plasmas, the effect is temporary. After the 48-hour torture test, all three of the plasma TVs that were tested showed clearly visible images from the game menu, whereas none of the LCD or MD [micro-display] rear projection-based sets showed any image retention. However, after regular video material (a DVD movie set to continuously loop) was played through the sets for 24 hours, the image completely disappeared from all three plasmas, leaving no trace. Unlike early generation plasmas, where those type of images would not go away and could actually “burn” onto the screen, modern plasma TVs enjoy a combination of more robust screen materials and subtle image-shifting technologies that have rendered this former issue moot.”
The IDC study concluded, “The commonly held beliefs about the viability and performance quality of plasma TVs turn out to be merely myths when held up to the discerning eye of quantifiable testing. In particular, concerns about plasma lifetimes and image retention (“burn in”) are half-truths that may have been legitimate concerns for early generations of plasma displays, but are non-issues with today’s current generation products. Yes, plasmas may show signs of retention if still images are left on the display for very long periods of time (such as 24 hours or more), but even in this extreme example, the result is only temporary. Today’s plasma TVs essentially heal themselves with subsequent viewing of regular TV material. As a result, more common scenarios of 5 to 10 minute (or even several hour) image pauses will not cause permanent damage.”
Joel Silver, Executive Director for the ISF sums up, “The short summary from that work [the IDC study] was that 48 continuous burn-in hours of a video game still frame menu screen was enough to produce a clearly visible but non-permanent “retained” image on many PDPs [plasma display panels] – none of the units showed any long term ill effects after running an additional 24 hours of moving video after the burn in test! Running a PDP in 4x3 for long periods will still result in uneven wear – that will eventually be visible and is not recommended. Current generation PDPs are far more rugged than early models – but phosphors do wear – for electronic signage with permanent fixed images LCDs are better choices – for home usage the LCD/PDP decisions are application specific and the decision parameters as you well know are now complex. But those decisions might get easier for dedicated theaters.”
So, that’s pretty much the story. Image retention or “burn-in” has all but vanished from plasma TVs today. Yes, it can still occur, if the display is abused. However, unlike earlier models, today’s plasmas can virtually eliminate “burn-in” via various methods employed by the leading manufactures. According to the experts, it’s a non-issue or myth. Pass me the popcorn!
But, DSM, read the comments. It’s not misuse. It’s watching a sporting event for a couple hours, and then having the scoring graphics visible for the next couple of days or more. And that’s with normal-to-dim brightness settings.
I’m not saying it still happens on all (or even most) displays, but it’s still a common occurence. The manufacturers are doing themselves no favors by claiming with every new generation of models that they’ve finally fixed the IR problems.
You can misuse anything and have bad things happen. Keeping plasmas at redline levels will tend to cause problems ;) Out-of-the-box is always wrong on the settings front, and most sets should be professionally calibrated anyway.
Educate your family (and yourself) about what to do and not do, and you should have smooth sailing.
When i was researching new TV’s I went to the manufacturers web sites and looked at owners manuals of the different types of flat panels. They still have the warnings about burn in. Even the newest Panasonic tells you not to have stationary images on the screen. If you game they tell you not game for more that 2 hrs. It’s not just Panasonic. Pick a plasma maker and then go look at the owners manual. They problem may be reduced but is still an issue.
I have a Panasonic TH42PZ700u and image retention still exists… If a picture is left on for a period of time and the set is turned off, I can see the picture when I turn it back on (Ii.e. movie title menu). I have not left anything on for longer than 10 minutes, but if it is on for more than 5, the image stays on the screen until a new image comes along to eliminate it.
I would avoid using a plasma as a primary computer monitor, or watch pillarboxed cartoons for hours on end, but I don’t think you need to avoid normal use because of IR. Oh, and it is not ghosting, that is related to a slower refresh rate on a lower quality LCD.
Home theater, automated lights and a high-tech fish tank.
Home theater, automated lights and a high-tech fish tank.
A new CEA study says that more builders are offering all types of technology.
It’s hard to imagine life without remote controls, but it’s been a long, strange path to the modern incarnation we know and love today.
Eric V. and Dashford, I also have a 42” Panny (under the HP label) and I watch a lot of soccer. If I watch two games that’s three hours of the soccer channel logo and sometimes more (and don’t forget there aren’t any commercials except for half time, but then I’m fast forwarding through that). I often get a ghosting (versus burn-in). Maybe it’s just me, but I’ll let an HD movie channel play for a couple hours. Sometimes I can still see it faintly when there’s a field of white on the screen.