Dorian Gray Studios use PMC MB2 XBD monitors for mixing and mastering.
The Rocky Mountain Audio Fest, held last weekend in Denver, CO, is one of the more relaxing assignments I travel to each year. RMAF is less like an industry conference and more like a hobbyist gathering. Consider it the Comi-Con for hi-fi enthusiasts.
Basically, at RMAF you travel from suite to suite at the Marriott, where dealers, distributors or manufacturers have set up their newest audio gear so you can sit down and chill. While ultimately the exhibitors want to sell you a system, rarely do you hear much of a sales pitch. Usually you need to tap someone on the shoulder to ask them about products before they’ll tell you. The emphasis is on the listening experience, not the hard sell; there’s usually a price list on the table to pick up on your way out.
At RMAF you will overhear or get engaged in a lot of audio geek talk, and this can be fun. One of the best I heard was during a visit to the PMC booth, where Mike Picanza was playing tunes on the company’s new model 21 bookshelf speakers, which run around $2,600 a pair (making them some of the more affordable speakers at the show).
PMC not only makes speakers for home use, but also studio monitors used in recording studios around the world. In his talk, Picanza wanted to emphasize how important studio monitors and mixing are to recorded music, but inadvertently also demonstrated something else.
Picanza played me three version of one track recorded at Dorian Gray Studios in Germany. The first version was the music recorded straight to the mixing board without any adjustments. It was essentially raw music. It sounded good, but a bit flat. Nothing was distinct. It lacked life and texture. The second version had the levels adjusted to bring the vocals forward and put the drums more toward the back. The third version was a final mixed track, the master stage. The final version was louder, fuller, with more emphasis on the voice and the piano. Altogether the master stage version sounded more three-dimensional. Everyone in the room liked that version best.
Nothing unusual was done to that track—that’s how recorded music happens. What we hear over our stereo systems is not necessarily exactly what happened when the band started playing and vocalist started singing. Much of the original performance, and the final effect, is manipulated to fulfill someone’s vision of what the music should sound like (which can be different from what it does sound like).
And this leads me to the point I believe Picanza unintentionally made (though he acknowledged it later when I brought it up). I call this the Myth of Live Music. Often we hear that the goal of music reproduction is to create the feeling of live music—make you believe the artist is playing in your living room. The truth, though, is that if the artist were playing in front of you, it would sound nothing like the CD.
Even most live music, unless it’s pure, unamplified acoustic, has gone through some electronic manipulation. Rather than being true to the sound of live music, the most you can hope for in a home stereo is being true to the recording (or true to the mastered version). But even that fails us sometimes, because if being true to the recording was enough, we’d all fill our homes with professional studio monitors instead of loudspeakers voiced for home use. A mixing room in a recording studio is acoustically very different from a living room, and most people would probably prefer the sound from traditional passive stereo speakers over studio monitors.
The point of this is that when we tell ourselves that the a recording played over our favorite equipment sounds realistic or live, what we really mean is that it created an emotional connection for us—we like it, accuracy be damned. That’s actually part of the magic of audio gear—the ability to create an impressive, immersive experience that is moving. Does one speaker sound more like the real thing than another? Most times we don’t even know what the real thing sounds like. We just know the sound we like.
That’s not to say that better equipment doesn’t sound better—of course it does. The better our speakers, amps and DACs, the more depth, texture and flavor we find. Great equipment can be revealing by letting us hear and experience moments in the the music that poor equipment hides. A great recording on a great system can sound even better than live music.

If the music you are listening too sounds better on a recording (mixed and played back on a hi-fi system), then perhaps the music you are listening to (live) or even the venue you are listening in is what is sub-par.
A properly mixed live show provides thousands of watts and extra dimensions, especially if you are near the stage, that a stereo speaker setup can never eclipse.
For instance, there is a mid-sized venue in my town where, no matter how well they mix the live music, it sounds *better* in the bathroom that is behind the stage.
Also, I like Radiohead, but there is no way I’m going to pay $200+/ticket to see them in a 15,000+ seat arena to listen to it on crappy 200W distributed audio speakers 300 feet from the stage. In that regards, I invest the money I would have spent on a live show to my “living room sound system kitty” so that I can host listening parties when these big name bands come through town.
And some bands never sound great live, no matter the venue. I simply choose not to like those bands.
If you want two contemporary bands that put on a heck of a live show, still play in intimate venues, and have high quality digital and vinyl recordings, check out The Appleseed Cast and Balmorhea.
Although it is nearly impossible to say what is truly accurate, I agree that live music pales when compared to a high end or even run of the mill stereo for detail.
However, live music is about the impact and rawness to it for me. The mistakes the players make and the emotion that you get from it.
I’ll admit that I don’t listen to classical or lots of unamplified accoustic music. I mainly listen to rock so I readily admit that my music sounds cleaner and more dynamic on a stereo but attending a nice sounding, loud concert can’t be beat.
Nice post Grant. To answer the above question all music is mixed and mastered (live recordings, studio albums) unless it’s a bootleg recording that comes straight from the front of house (FOH) engineer’s mixing console.
Often times, particularly with a live album a group or artist will record an entire tour and cherry pick the best performances from the tour to make a whole live album (they do this to weed out venues that may not sound so good or performances that maybe the band had a bad night for example). During the mixing of a live album the artist through the recording engineer may have specific goals in mind and they shoot at the target of meeting those goals. Those goals include maybe a certain element like the way the crowd is integrated into the sound or simply the purpose of capturing a group of songs for whatever reason.
I’m not a recording engineer, but so I can’t perfectly answer that, but I do know that often recordings are tweaked to create a sound someone wants, but not necessarily the sound that came from the instrument (or voice). Also, some speakers measure more accurately than others, but that doesn’t mean they sound “better.” That’s why audio reproduction is at least as much art as it is science.
Microsoft’s next game system is anything but just a game system
Home with a variety of viewing situations calls for variety of mounting solutions.
3M technology poised to boost the vibrancy and richness of colors on LCD screens.
We take a peek at some of the current options for outdoor audio.
Matt, thanks for the tips. I will check out those bands.