by Ron Goldberg
Somewhere in the space/time continuum, with a healthy nudge from market forces, cheaper replaced better as the primary come-on in the home entertainment landscape. Case in point—the demise of separate components in favor of integrated, all-in-one “solutions.”
Don’t get us wrong, cheap and easy can be charming qualities. But better is a trump card, and if you like better—as in better performance, better setup options, better reliability and a few other assorted betters—you’ll almost always find it through separate components, rather than one-box systems.
Yes, that means more components, more wires, more space, more adjustments and (typically), more expense. But it you’re building an A/V system to savor, with best performance today and best options for extending it the future, here are seven essential reasons to consider basing your system on separate components, rather than an all-in-one receiver.
Flexibility
Want to expand on your A/V investment with new software, features and upgrades as they become available? A separate preamp/processor will let you download them and also give you enough connectivity to extend hardware too, such as through outboard D/A converters, video scalers, flash drives and the like.
Connectivity
Separates will almost always give you more connection options for more gear (old and new). Want more power to drive those new tower speakers you’ve just upgraded to? Connect more amplification. Want an extra input so the family can watch the camcorder footage you just shot, or a USB slot for some music? You’ll usually find more (and higher quality) connection jacks/ports on separates than all-in-one receivers.

Krell Phantom II stereo preamp
Performance
With separates, engineers don’t have to compromise their art by the practical considerations of having to jam things into a single small (and less costly) box. The task at hand—preamplification, decoding, routing, amplification, etc, is all that matters in a separate component. Long story short—best possible performance comes from separate, dedicated components, where the designers have not been constrained nearly as much by factors of size, weight and cost. All the best performing components in the A/V market are separates; even the receiver makers (which often also make separates) would have to agree.
Reliability
When one thing goes wrong with a receiver, the entire receiver goes in for repair. With separates, you’re not stuck with nothing in case there’s a problem. For example, tuner not receiving channels? Tuner goes in for repair, but you can still watch and listen to other sources. In a one-box receiver, multiple functions are often built onto the same circuit board. If one aspect of the board goes, the whole board (even the working functions) needs replacement. In separates, there are usually dedicated circuit boards for various functions, which are easier (and ironically, often cheaper) to replace.
ADA Cinema Rhapsody Mach IV-B home theater controller
Quality Of Components
Separates are the premium offerings from a manufacturer. Their best engineering and part selection is reserved for these dedicated environments where there is less need for physical or economic compromise. Internal components are chosen for their efficacy, not their efficiency or cost. This not only translates into better performance, but more often than not, greater reliability.

Anthem Statement A5 amplifier
Upgradability
When you’ve outgrown your receiver you need to replace it. When does this happen? Maybe you’re moving the setup into a larger room that needs more power. Or you’ve upgraded to bigger, hungrier speakers. Or you’ve decided that 7.1 would be more fun than 5.1. Or you’ve decided a new D/A converter with the latest decoding might sound even better than what you have. With separates you can always improve every link in the chain over time.
Even Receivers Can Be Separates
It may be tempting to buy that one-box disc player/amplifier/speakers/sub kitchen sink audio solution you saw displayed at the store. It’d be cheaper. It might even be easier (though not necessarily; they’re often a bear to actually operate). But it will never be better sounding or performing than any up-to-date A/V receiver and real speakers from real speaker manufacturers. You can put together an inexpensive receiver and speaker combo for not much more at all than what you’d pay for the plastic pretenders that come with a cheap HTIB (Home Theater in a Box).
All-in-one is a nice idea for a phone. For an A/V system that performs rather than just plays, you need to hear what’s possible these days. And the best of what’s possible is in separate components.
The claim that separates are the best way to achieve the very best sound reproduction is absolute rubbish.
The very best sound reproduction is achieved using active monitors (powered loudspeakers) as used in just about every recording studio in the world. Active studio monitors are *not* designed for low cost - they are designed for the absolute best audio performance. The only way to achieve this level of audio performance is by using active crossovers, and dedicated amplification for each speaker drive unit - this is expensive, and can only be achieved through very tight integration, not random component boxes.
While there is no denying that most companies that make integrated systems put out abysmally bad products, this is not a justification for components as being necessary, or being the only way to get great sound. It ABSOLUTELY IS possible to achieve the very best sound reproduction in an integrated system, if it is designed well.
And here is the real truth about components: they allow high-end companies to gauge more money out of the customers. It is easy to justify another $999 (or $9999!) if you are getting another box, much harder to justify ridiculous prices in an integrated system. This is the real and honest truth about audio components. How do I know? I used to work for a prominent high-end audio company (which shall remain unnamed for legal reasons).
And let’s talk about the whole upgradeability thing. This is a fine sales line, but virtually nobody does it - and I mean literally almost nobody. Again, having worked in a high-end audio company, I had access to purchasing pattern statistics. The upgrade mantra is a total myth. The fact is people buy a system, keep it for 5-10 years, then usually upgrade the whole system. The notion that you keep some bits and throw out others is NOT real, and should definitely not be driving your purchasing decisions.
So there you have it - the truth, untarnished by the advertising dollar. What you do with YOUR dollar is entirely up to you, just don’t get suckered in by some of the myths portrayed in the above article.
Alberta home is prepped with home automation and home theater to attract prospective buyers.
Alberta home is prepped with home automation and home theater to attract prospective buyers.
3M technology poised to boost the vibrancy and richness of colors on LCD screens.
We take a peek at some of the current options for outdoor audio.
Active monitors are a nice advance in the studio and there are some excellent active midfields out there (Meyer, Tannoy, etc.) but every studio I’ve seen that uses them also uses big passive reference speakers (and big outboard amps) for the final say (and besides those, also the little nearfields, often with tissue hanging off the tweeter - you know what I mean). In a residential, non-studio setting, active speakers are still usually low end, sometimes very high end like the Meridians. It’s a technology worth watching, but I haven’t met an audiophile yet who’d give up separates for an integrated receiver or active speakers.