Print Email RSS RSS  Share del.icio.us Facebook Twitter
Samsung’s Slimmer Than Slim LCD Just 10 Millimeters Thick
Samsung is showing off a 40-inch LCD panel that's just 10-mm, or .39 inches, deep this week at FPD International 2007.
Samsung Slim LCD
Samsung’s super-slim 40-inch LCD
October 22, 2007 | by Arlen Schweiger

File this one under the this-is-getting-ridiculous category. Samsung this week plans to show an LCD panel with an ultra, ultra slim bezel depth of 10 millimeters. That’s .39 inches for those of us who aren’t using the metric system.

And it’s not for a tiny OLED-like 11 inch TV—it’s for a 40-inch diagonal LCD, sure to make the folks at the FPD International 2007 show in Yokohama, Japan, drool a little.

Samsung’s taking the slim-profile LCD with nods to the monitors designed for desktop computers. That includes energy efficiency, too, with the power consumption reportedly at 90 watts or less.

Pretty soon we’ll just need poster frames to decorate our TVs.

Via: NewsWire



Arlen Schweiger - Managing editor of Electronic House Magazine
Arlen contributes product news items to electronichouse.com along with his role on the print publication. Got a tip? Send it along!



Article Topics
What's Related
Popular Tags
Social Bookmark   less


Comments (10) Most recent displayed first.
Posted by Arlen Schweiger  on  10/23/07  at  11:10 AM

Ha, that would be nice.  You’ll just have to settle for Bang & Olufsen’s wall-mounted vertical CD player for now, maybe get a media center with cablecard to get rid of the cable and tivo boxes ...

Posted by Mozart  on  10/23/07  at  10:58 AM

What I want to know is, when are the rest of the components going to change their form factors?

So I have a nice thin 52” LCD tv, and that’s great and all, but I still need a hutch to hold the receiver, dvd player, tivo, cable box, etc, etc.

How about changing the form factor of these devices to be wider and less deep?

Posted by amedius  on  10/23/07  at  01:23 AM

It will be the greatest leap in televesion history


+ View all comments on for this article



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.