You just don’t get it do you. Our point was made a long time ago and really wasn’t all that important to begin with. The article’s good, and sure, I would have like to see some more pics. I mean, who wouldn’t? But, you getting all hot under the collar has made our day! :) I hope you had as much fun with this as we did.

PS Wookies do live on Endor

“This monkey smokes cigarettes, rides a dirt bike, does algebra, teaches kung fu at the Y and sings back up vocals for bruce springsteen. check it out its true

check out this URL http://www.lovesanimals.com/images/animals/monkey/funny_monkey.jpg”

That’s no monkey!  That IS Bruce Springsteen!!!

we as consumers want the pictures.

Yes, I understand that *you* want pictures; you’ve made that pretty clear.
I’m just as much of a consumer as you are, and given the choice of no
article, or an article without pictures, I prefer to have the article (yes,
ideally I’d like to have both so people like you could be happy too, but
apparently that wasn’t possible here). Why is your “vote” more valuable
than mine?

And again the title says “Jungle Home Theater Really Roars”. I still fail
to see anything misleading there. If you’re talking about the sub-title,
yes it refers to bamboo pots (shown), an overhead mural (shown, though the
quality certainly isn’t great) and monkey sconces, not shown.

So you’re saying, you came to this page, read the headline, read the
sub-title, then invested time in reading the text and didn’t see photos
and you feel somehow that you’ve been mis-treated..that your time is too
valuable for you to have come to this page and not been able to see photos.

And yet spending 2 days arguing about the lack of photos is a valuable use
of your time?

Whatever…for myself, I’d rather have more content, and I’d hate to see
ElectronicHouse not post an article just because they don’t have a couple
of pictures… and my page views are just as valuable as yours.

Preslar:
What do you have to do with this anyway?

I read the site, I want them to post more content, not less. I don’t want
them thinking all their readers need “visual aids” in order to be happy.

Don’t give a great title and then not let me see it as WELL as read
about it.

So again, even though you stated the article was informative, you’d rather
they hadn’t posted the article because they had no photos. Is that correct?

“Maybe whoever owns the theater doesn’t want to let them take photos? Who knows?”

And maybe a wookie lives on Endore? Who knows?

My point is this, when I sell a theater the home owner has to see it, invision it, as if it were already in there home. This helps them to own the theater before the pen hits the paper. I’m sorry for thinking you wrote this, but now that I know you did go down a notch in my book. What do you have to do with this anyway? 

“HEY EVERYONE! Come check out my Lord of the Rings inspired home theater! It has life size trees in each corner branching up to a forest canopy over head, a laser optic starry night sky, and little hobbits all around. Now instead of listening to rich mind enveloping speakers on my own true HD, better than life, iMAX screen lets sit IN my theater and read about it. If everyone will get out there books and turn to chapter 4 (this one sounds REALLY good)”

Hey we get excited about this stuff. We are visual people. Don’t give a great title and then not let me see it as WELL as read about it.

Steve H.

I beleive the point we are trying to make is that we as consumers want the pictures. No one wants to read a title eluding to all sorts of cool stuff and then click to an article that contains no pics of it. The “Secret Door” Article was another perfect example…....the title said “Home theater has cool secret to to access equipment” Again not one picture of any secret anything!

I really thought for sure the whole “monkey” analogy would sum this up for you. Guess not, heres another one.  I could preach all day about unicorns and how cool they are but you would never believe me unless you saw one. (That does not include your my little pony collection)