Earlier this week a court basically told Kaleidescape that the DVD movie server they sell is illegal and they have to stop doing it. I won’t get into the detail of the case here (but if you want to learn all about it, you can read a thorough analysis at our sister publication CE Pro), but I’ll say that the Kaleidescape system has been for several years the premier video product for luxury home theaters and integrated homes. It’s not some hacked system any kid can build (we’ll look at some of those later). This is a well-engineered, licensed and supported product favored by many custom installation professionals.
But that product’s future is now in question. If it were out of the picture in it’s current incarnation (we have no doubt Kaleidescape will work on an agreeable solution), what then is left for people who love their massive movie collections? Music collectors found nirvana in iTunes, music servers and iPods. To combat crappy compression you can encode at higher rates, use FLAC or a handful of other high resolution formats—still, managing and accessing a massive music collection really isn’t difficult.
But then there’s movies. Why should movies be treated differently than music? There are reason that lawyers understand, but me, I just get mad. I can take the CD collection I spent years and thousands of dollars amassing, rip them legally onto my computer (because I own the CDs, own the computer, and own the iPod the music will eventually land on), but I can’t do anything remotely like that with my movies. And I’ve got boxes and boxes of them. Garage sales at my house are great because I usually end up selling tons of movies for a buck each because I don’t have anywhere to put them.
So back to the question: What’s the best way to manage your movie collection, now?
My guess is that movie studios want that way to be something akin to UltraViolet and what Walmart (shudder) and Vudu announced yesterday. Oh gee, I can’t wait to line up to pay $2-$5 to watch movies I already paid $15-$30 for when I bought the discs. Sure, that’s gonna work.
What about Netflix, Amazon and other streaming services? Should we just give up on the idea of owning movies and instead rely on VOD-style services? To be honest, that method serves my home pretty well. It let me catch up on old episodes of Jericho last week and the season finale of Walking Dead I missed on Sunday night (why didn’t my DVR get it?). But it’s no way to watch a high-quality movie if I want the best picture and sound. For that, I buy a Blu-ray.
Is turning to cloak and dagger DVD ripping software the way to go? Not if it could land me in legal hot water. I like my kids, but I don’t want them visiting me in jail.
So far, the industry and movie studios haven’t given us a fair and reasonable option. At this point I don’t really think they want to. I’d really like to know what other people do.

Honestly, I find it all very funny. The people that are willing to do the right thing are the ones getting punished. The people that go out and buy the discs and use a Kaleidescape system or something are the people they want ripping discs. The people that rip and distribute are the ones the studios are the most afraid of, and this ruling has no effect on them. They are going to keep doing what they are doing because they were never planning on doing it legally anyway. The music industry finally got their head straight and look how the digital music industry has exploded. The movie studios should be ashamed of themselves for acting the way they do. Provide a construct for people to do it legally and people probably will. Vudu probably has the best thing going for digital purchasing and excellent audio and video quality. With home theaters become more common place and less luxury, more people want high quality audio and video. Give it to them! Suck up your pride, movie studios, and jump on board with the rest of the modern day media.
To my way of thinking; A disc is a disc, be it a cd, or a DVD or Blueray. I bought it, I own it and that copy of the contents on it. I can do what I need to do with it with the fair-use stranded. If I want to put a copy on a movie on my local home server for my personal use thats my business, as Long as that where it stays, The courts have allready decided that its ok to rip cds to make digitial copies to play on portable media players, So why can’t one rig a movie to play on their brand new IPad, Android Tablet?
To me there no difference, its all digital data at this point.
Also why is the Roku and Boxee shown in the teaser picture above? Their not mention in the story.
As for streaming I use both a Roku and Netflix and love both.
Ken Lawson
lawsonreport.info
What do I do? I sure don’t let the movie studios dictate to me how I’ll store all the movies I PAID GOOD MONEY FOR. I do with them as I see fit within the confines of my home, plain and simple.
In my case, I put what I want on my network drives and stream them out to my HT on-demand…
-CD-
The woven acoustic screen is now available in a retractable, masking version.
Centralized home control and automation plus boatload of A/V options including dropdown theater screen revitalize 12K-square-foot home.
Should TV manufacturers offer dumbed-down TVs that focus on image quality rather than apps?
Say hello to home control in this high-tech palace, circa 2006.
I like the basic idea behind the WalMat/Vudu cloud program “IF” they would support iOs and Android devices.
_BUT_
Currently they seem to only support PC’s, Set-Top and SmatTV’s.
So if I was going to play a movie at home and own the disc, I will play the disc.
Might be good if I was traveling with a Laptop or maybe a Windows based NetBook.