When Should You Spring for a Touchscreen?


RTI T2-B, hybrid with monochrome touchscreen

The more AV sources you have, the more important a touchscreen remote becomes.

Jul. 12, 2010 — by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

“Any time is a good time to swap your button-laden remote for one with a touchscreen,” says Pete Baker, vice president of sales and marketing for Remote Technologies Inc. (RTI).

The reason? In a nutshell, greater control over your entertainment experience.

A touchscreen provides a way to display more information about your A/V system. You’ll be able to see a catalog of movies loaded in your media server, peruse the song titles in your iPod and get to a list of your 10 favorite satellite channels. Just touch what you want to watch or listen to, and the remote shoots out a command to the appropriate equipment.

Another benefit, says Baker, is the ability to get more descriptive with commands. On a touchscreen the command can be spelled out in plain English. Play movie and listen to music, to most people, makes more sense than a button with an arrow on it or labeled Aux1.

So should you give up buttons altogether? Not necessarily, says Baker.

“Nothing beats the tactile feel of a button when you’re operating a system in the dark.”

Plus, buttons still offer the quickest, most convenient way to launch common commands like channel up and down and volume up and down.” Baker’s recommendation: a “hybrid” remote, which combines hard buttons with a touchscreen.

Some examples of RTI’s options:
RTI T1-B hardbuttoned remote, $349

RTI T2-B, hybrid with monochrome touchscreen, $499

RTI T2-Cs, hybrid with a color touchscreen, $699

Return to full story: