We became an XM family a little over a year ago. I bought my wife a boom box unit for her office and its portable tuner module moves back and forth between our two cars on weekends. But the home docking station hasn’t found its way out of the box.
Based on my sub-par ownership experience and the emotionally unsatisfying sonic performance, I was really starting to feel that XM, while useful for things likes out of town sports broadcasting and some commercial-free narrow-format channels, wasn’t part of my listening future. However, last week’s XM/Sirius merger announcement caused me to rethink my position: Maybe there’s hope for satellite “radio” yet.
My ownership experience got off on the wrong foot when I had to return the boom box unit and tuner to Delco for a modification. My wife pointed out an irritating buzz and a secondary ticking sound at low volume. As the resident audiophile, I felt ashamed. I originally demo’d the XM tuner at high volume and only for a few moments. My wife listens to music at very low volume so she won’t disturb anyone in the next Dilbert-like cubicle at work. Sure enough, there it was. Buzz, hum and ticking. A real turn off.
So I shipped the unit back for modifications once the customer service dude said “oh yeah, we know what that is. We have a mod for that.” As my upper Midwestern Norwegian friends would say, “uff dah.”
Buzzing aside, it’s been the less than advertised sonic experience that really disappoints me. How one judges the quality of HiFi gear or a recording should largely be based on emotional satisfaction. So far, satellite radio leaves me cold. Distortion free? Hardly. Especially when you use the FM modulator interface. Shortcomings include: high tension wire distortion, bleed-over from analog radio stations, an insidious “gurgling digital noise,” and signal drop outs.
But it’s the overall lack of dynamics and compressed “thin” quality of the signal that’s been the biggest turn-off. The sound is much worse than that of the first CDs back in ‘82-‘83.
Sure satellite radio’s scrolling information displays are nice. And the “rewind” feature is nifty for catching something on the news or talk radio you’ve missed while on the phone. But with all this Buck Rogers satellite technology, surely someone in charge will finally ask the ultimate question – how does it sound?
Memo to the new guys in charge at XM/Sirius or whatever you decide to call yourselves: here’s my top three ideas on how to win over myself and others who care about sound quality.
Maybe if you take this list to heart, you might just win me back and keep me from saying “uff dah” to satellite “radio” forever.
John Caldwell is a 28-year grizzled veteran of the A/V business
and co-founder of StJohn Group, Inc.

Geez…....and I thought I was the only one who thought that satellite radio sounded like crap. For those who think that satellite radio and MP3s are the wave of the future, I can only feel pity for you - you are settling for lousy sound.
I’d sooner buy a used Corvair than listen to that junk.
Roberta
THANK GOD PEOPLE ARE FINALLY saying something about the abysmal and thin sound quality of satellite radio. It sounds like AM radio without the static, but with garbled digital distortion thrown in.
I love music and love the idea of satellite *radio*.
But with the sound quality so disappointly poor, I have had to let my subscription go until they dedicate more bandwith to music, stop compressing the stream so much, and stop squeezing all of the life and body out music.
I have a Xact XTR sirius PnP tuner. I have heard several sirius tuners via FM modulator and the audio out headphone jack. My old Xact tuner sounds better over FM or line out than any new “sirius” tuner. The quality varies depending on the receiver used. Id like to try the sirius tuners with the digital out and and a homebrew DAC!
Try running a digital ouput from an XM tuner (Polk for instance) into a really good DAC. I use a Benchmark Media Systems DAC. Makes quite a difference in sound. Close to CD quality ...depending on the channel.
Home theater, automated lights and a high-tech fish tank.
Home theater, automated lights and a high-tech fish tank.
A new CEA study says that more builders are offering all types of technology.
It’s hard to imagine life without remote controls, but it’s been a long, strange path to the modern incarnation we know and love today.
Ever since they added Canada channels and some video service, it’s EVEN WORSE.
They really need to do something about it.
It’s a wonderful idea who’s time has come, with fantastic content and programming, RUINED by cheap technology.
It’s like taking a picture of a beautiful scene with a cell phone camera. Sure you can make out what’s there, but the color is way off and the beautiful details just can’t be seen.