For the most part, you’ve had some choice over the networking technology you use to move data around the house. But as networks get smarter and more powerful, that’s fast changing. Broadband service providers are employing technologies called MoCA and HomePNA to move video programming over your existing coax cables and phone lines. And over the next year, a standard called WiMedia will let your PCs, peripherals and phones trade large data files and multimedia streams at close range wirelessly.
This new generation of home networking technologies is stable and very, very fast.
MoCA and HPNA are “entertainment networks,” primarily built to move video programming (traditional TV shows and Internet content) from your doorstep to multiple TVs and other display devices (in other words, IPTV and multi-room DVR). Of course, they handle other types of data, too, but this might be dictated by the type of service you sign up for (phone, Internet access, mobile features).
Both MoCA and HPNA 3.1 are driven by the telcos—AT&T/SBC, Verizon, others yet to announce—who are spending billions of dollars to upgrade their DSL networks to fiber to deliver the same caliber of services as the cable providers do today.
MoCA, a nascent technology launched in 2004, was founded by people who spent years developing HomePlug powerline networks. These folks contend that coax is a far superior network transport.
MoCA signed a deal with Verizon to provide the in-home connections of its fiber-to-the-home service, FiOS. Similarly, HPNA is used in AT&T’s fiber offering U-Verse. Both Buffkin and HPNA marketing VP Rich Nesin say other partnerships will be announced soon.
In the grand scheme of things, these first deployments are small. But if you live in an AT&T or Verizon market, “triple play” and “IPTV” marketing offers are inevitable. If you’re curious which providers are leaning one way or another, scan the list of MoCA and HomePNA members. You’ll see all the cable operators, too, indicating the way the whole industry is moving.
Shielding the Consumer
But don’t expect to find technology details of these services, because service providers don’t think you need to know. “A consumer could have HPNA and not even know it,” says Nesin.
They could be right. TR69 is a robust standard for remote monitoring written by the DSL Forum that allows service providers to see your connection speed, error rates and signal-to-noise ratio. Having such information handy improves customer service and keeps support costs low.
Concern over support costs is the main reason you won’t see MoCA or HomePNA 3.0 gear at retail. “They [service providers] want to control the rollouts,” says Nesin. “Just like with cable modems, you’ll be able to buy equipment in stores later on.” MoCA equipment will be in stores by year’s end, says Buffkin.
Older HomePNA 2.0 gear is still sold in retail, and offered by SBC/BellSouth for data networking. HPNA 3.0 gear is backwards compatible with HPNA 2.0 equipment over phone line only, says Nesin.
Motorola is shipping MoCA bridges and set-top boxes, and Actiontec is shipping a router with MoCA and Wi-Fi—all to service providers.
HPNA 3.1 equipment consists of (at minimum) a set-top box for your TV and a slick residential gateway from 2Wire. Signing up for FiOS or U-Verse requires a “truck roll” for technicians and packages vary in price. In the next year or two, more choice should drive costs down as telcos try to lure cable and satellite users.
MoCA and HPNA are strong competitors and many service providers are sampling both in trials. One advantage to MoCA is that it’s interoperable with the DOCSIS cable modem standard as well as with digital and analog cable, making it more attractive to cable companies. Yet, HPNA supports TR69. In time, MoCA will also work over phone lines, making the two technologies even tougher to distinguish.
Another Option: Ultrawideband
Ultrawideband (UWB) is a short-range radio technology that provides about 100 Mbps throughput (data rate is 480 Mbps) within 10 meters. Shepherded to market by the WiMedia Alliance, the first UWB products will reach retail later this year.
In order to build industry consensus, the WiMedia Alliance had to build in support for other much slower short-range wireless networking technologies, Bluetooth and Wireless USB. To do so, WiMedia uses a single radio across all three platforms (UWB, Bluetooth, Wireless USB), then incorporates a software stack for each on top. A vendor will incorporate one, two or all three stacks into a given product, depending on what the company wants to connect.
Logic dictates that Bluetooth headset vendors will use UWB Bluetooth, printer and camera makers will use UWB Wireless USB, and smart phone makers who want to connect to anything that comes along will likely use all three, says WiMedia Alliance president Stephen Wood.
WiMedia will first appear this spring in the form of a dongle, a hardware device that plugs into your USB port. Within a year, WiMedia network interface cards and chipsets will follow. However, the three stacks will roll out separately with UWB Wireless USB coming first, followed by UWB, and then UWB Bluetooth will come next year.
In terms of backwards compatibility, UWB Bluetooth will work with older Bluetooth devices. To achieve backwards compatibility between UWB Wireless USB and older Wireless USB, you need a hub. Devices that don’t share the same stacks won’t work together. Devices that do will sport matching logos.

Thanks to EH for this brief introduction to an area of immense importance to home AV and control distribution. This is particularly true for video distribution. EH would be doing the community a huge service with an in depth white paper on the modalities and weighted comparisons of all the options for video inhouse distribution. I think this is currently the most difficult area of home network design to choose correctly within.
HIgh quality large format displays are dropping in price rapidly and video sources are expanding. The center of attention and gravity is how to get many source options to many locations. With gig ethernet very affordable now, you have a lot of network and distribution options. HDMI with extenders, modulated RF, video over CAT5, MoCA, HPNA, Vista MC on network, etc, add your own. And now we also have the very interesting solution coming into beta of NetStreams DigiLinx AV with uncompressed HD over gig network IP. All these solutions across the vectors of quality, cost, reliability, ease of use, and expandability. Expert help and analysis would really be appreciated.
I included fiber with my structured wiring installation and think it should be included with the next generation home networks. What about good old Fast Ethernet? Will anyone attempt to interconnect all these these networks? Or will the jumble of incompatibility continue to make life miserable?
I just want something better than 21 kps over 40 year old phone lines. Way out in the pine trees of NC we stand no chance of better except satellite which isn’t better just MORE ecpensive.
Dell is making it easy to add 3D into the home, with a great deal on this Samsung bundle.
DPI’s super-bright projector and ada’s high-wattage audio create a reference-grade A/V oasis.
What makes a thermostat “smart”?
Here are 10 great gifts for the tech geek in your life.
Indeed the connected home iis currently a myriad of disparate technologies and mediums.
There are some questions to ask before settling on any single technology.
Is it easy to install? Is there a truck roll? Complicated manuals? Do I need to pull new wire?
Does it interfere with what I already have in place? Can I watch TV and do email at the same time? If I turn on my microwave, does my Internet connection suffer?
Can any of these new technology standards support multiple streams of high defintion content?
Are the standard bodies responsible for safeguarding the technology? Do they provide interoperability tests? Is there a logo program equivalent to the Good Housekeeping Seal?
Which is better a wired or wireless approach? Can any current wireless technology, most notably WiFi reliably carry high defintion video? Aren’t there interferece and reliability issues? Good for data and portability, but what about full motion video?
We will tolerate a dropped cell phone call, but not video with latency.
The MoCA website, mocalliance.org, posts a white paper comparing the various home technologies listed above.