Beware, not all High Def is created (or transmitted) equally. Channel compression can play a big role in your picture quality.
Since the advent of HDTV, few things have aroused more anger in HD viewers than the purported use of “HD-Lite” by television service providers. Before declaring oneself a victim, the consumer needs to understand just what HD-Lite is, when it might be used, and what else could be responsible for that alleged less-than-HD image up on the screen.
HD-Lite or HD Compression?
The phrase HD-Lite is thrown around by many as a blanket explanation for any perceived degradation in an HD picture. The finger of blame has been pointed at the service provider (most notably the satellite companies, although recently Comcast has come under fire for it), and though it’s a major consumer talking point, few service providers are talking. One definition of HD-Lite that surfaces most often is “any alteration of original HD source content.” Well, if compression counts as alteration, then guess what? All your HD is HD-Lite.
In order to send multiple channels over a limited bandwidth, satellite companies, cable companies, OTA broadcasts and Telco’s all have to compress. The satellite companies are using MPEG-4, cable companies are using a mix of MPEG-2 and MPEG-4, U.S. broadcasters exclusively use MPEG-2, and some Telcos have been known to use VC-1 (Microsoft’s Windows Media compression system) – regardless of compression method, they ALL do it. (With the possible exception of Verizon FiOS, whose spokesperson claimed they do NOT compress their HD. While it is true that their fiber-to-the-premises roll-out provides an exceedingly large bandwidth, this writer believes that the spokesperson may have confused over-compression – i.e., downsampling or excessive bit-rate shaping—with just good-old-fashioned compression.)
Service providers receive HD content from ABC, ESPN, CNN, etc., in either 720p or 1080i. To send that content to the end-user, the content gets compressed. “When HD content is compressed, three things are done to it,” says Peter Symes, Director of Standards and Engineering for the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE). “First, redundant info is thrown away, then info is thrown away that will produce an infinitesimal difference in picture not visible to the human eye. Finally, even more info is thrown away that will only have a minimal effect on what is seen on the receiver.” In short, that HD channel you watch has been chopped up and squeezed as much as possible without having a huge impact on the final image…or so the provider hopes. “It’s a big juggling act,” insists Symes, who also believes that the large number of variables in the HD equation make it improbable that one regulated standard – for the way HD is sent from network to provider, for the way it is sent from provider to consumer, or even how HD televisions are built – will ever emerge.
X, Y, and Z – The HD Variables
Before you go switching your digital television service provider because your current one compresses its HD content, know this: that HD content has been altered even before it reached your service provider. In preparation for the final delivery stage, HD content (like a live basketball game, for example), might be routed across the country via satellite to the service provider. When both HD and SD content are sent to service providers on the same channel, the network sending the content will use statistical multiplexing to maximize image quality on a limited bandwidth. Statistical multiplexing allocates bits to the program that needs it most, but compromises are made for all the programs sent on any given channel. This includes the HD content. So even before the cable company or satellite company gets to send it to your set-top box, the HD image may have already been compressed, and/or had its bit rate shaved to save bandwidth.
We’re not all watching HDTV on the same television sets, through the same set-top box, from the same service providers, in the same room. HDTVs vary drastically, and many consumers are purchasing the wrong set for their specific viewing situation, i.e. too big a screen for too small a room. This will impair one’s viewing experience. Set-top boxes play their role as well. Set-top boxes have the responsibility to upscale or downscale content for viewing on a television. They are not all created equal; some do a good job, some do not.
The way that any given service provider elects to “shape” HD content varies, too. This is dependent on the bandwidth available to that service provider and the number of HD channels being provided. “They are all trying to do a good job,” says Symes, “and they are dealing with the bandwidth available, playing with a balance of number of channels and compression.” Subscribers want more channels, and more channels mean more advertising. It’s easy to see how the service provider would sacrifice some quality for those reasons.

A couple thoughts:
1) The first HD-Lite complaints were directed at DirecTV for “down-ressing” or downsampling of their HD content, or taking 1920 x 1080 and dropping it to 1440 or 1280 (I think it was 1440) x 1080, which resulted in a degraded HD image. As I understand it, this practice was halted by that DBS company with upgrades. HOWEVER, altering of HD content still occurs, so the broader definition of HD-lite is used to include any alteration of the content that reduces the image to something less than “full HD.” Does this make sense grumpy? 720p and 1080i are both considered “HD.” So too can downsampling, bit rate shaping, and overcompression be considered “HD-lite.” That’s the thinking, at least.
2) When one speaks to service providers about their HD offerings, they talk only of the number of HD channels they have, and how many more they plan to launch in 2008. No one talks about the QUALITY of their HD. Why? Because it would SEEM that consumers are throwing their subscription dollars at the provider with the most, not the best. The consumer will get quality HD when they use what power they have to demand it: their money. THAT is the real point…
The most control users have is with DVD and Blu-Ray media that we control. The rest is subject to the will of the providers.
Broadcast as a medium (local over the air) is fixed in maximum bandwidth for the channels/subchannels it uses. I don’t see that they have any reason to limit their use of what they’ve been given. And I don’t think under present regulations they give/sell any of it to others.
Satellites are similarly limited, though the transponders of the satellites, when owned by a provider, can be constantly managed to change bandwidth (give pay-per-view more bandwidth than local channels). But once the signal leaves the satellite users of the stream don’t interfere with each other in receiving it and using it. It’s then up to the quality of the equipment to take it to your eyes.
Cable is also fixed in capacity, though again can be managed as to quantity versus quality of transmission (add more channels and someone’s going to pay once total bandwidth use of the cable has hit 100%). And it’s a shared medium, so many things can happen on its way to your receiver.
What I’ve found so far in the S.F. Bay area is that Over the Air digital provides the highest quality of viewing experience. I cannot say this is a function of higher bandwidth, since I don’t have the tools for comparison. It may be the nature of a) the broadcast to ATSC tuner b)to the TV. That, versus the DirecTV satellite to the HR-21 box and it’s tuning. And cable is a bit poorer, and here, again, it could also involve the fact that cable is a shared medium, with internet traffic moving along many of the same wires. This has the potential to impact data flow rates, with video having the most to “lose”.
Net: just know that this is a potentially long chain from source to destination, fraught with many potential bumps in the transmission road.
Sure, there are lots of variables. But in general there is a slow trickle to “more channels rather than more quality” among most service providers.
I think we are all forgetting 1 thing here - no matter how “bad” an HD signal might be, it is still WAY BETTER than the old #@$%%^ SD signals that we have been subjected to for so long! It still amazes me that the major sports operations are still not all in HD to this day! -That is FAR worse than a slightly degraded HD signal.
BlueCast adapter gives OutCast and OutCast Jr. portable systems more versatility
JVC’s upscaling projection, Da-Lite screen and Current Audio speakers get fired up in this dedicated home cinema.
3M technology poised to boost the vibrancy and richness of colors on LCD screens.
We take a peek at some of the current options for outdoor audio.
It’s real simple Get Blu-ray and enjoy.