Print Email RSS RSS  Share del.icio.us Facebook Twitter
Good Home Theater for Less Than $1000
Want to build a home entertainment system around your TV? Here's what you can get on a $1,000 budget.
budget home theater
Slideshow
image
View Slideshow

March 07, 2008 | by Jeff Winston

So you’re finally tired of your old VCR and have decided to enter the 21st century. You have an HDTV, but you’re still not rich and famous, so you’d like to experience a modern home theater without breaking the bank. Truth is, you don’t need every type of component or feature. You can have a good home entertainment experience with just a few of the basics.

The center of any home theater system is an integrated receiver. This single device provides video and audio switching, audio and video processing, and speaker amplification. You can spend thousands of dollars on a receiver, but you really don’t have to. Start with only “5.1” channels of amplification. This means your receiver can power three main audio channels (left, front, and right), two rear channels (for surround), and a subwoofer (the “.1”). Neither the rear channels nor the subwoofer are required, but having a subwoofer allows you to buy smaller (i.e., less expensive) main speakers as the subwoofer generates all the hard-to-reproduce low frequencies. Likewise, you can even start your system without surround speakers if funds are tight.

For power, 100W (peak) for each front channel and 40W for each rear one is plenty, though make sure it’s spec’d into an 8 ohm load. Still, it takes a doubling of wattage to produce a noticeable increase in volume, so don’t sweat the difference between, say, 80W and 100W, as you really won’t hear the difference. Most of the time your system will be putting out much less than its rated power anyway.

HDMI is the new standard for hi-definition video cabling, so your receiver should have at least 3 HDMI inputs (one each for your TV, cable/satellite box, and DVD player/recorder). Audio and video processing modes (which massage the sound to make it seem like a “Jazz Club” or “Concert Hall”) are fun to play with, but don’t pay for more as you may not use them that much. 

Onkyo makes a variety of solid receivers at various price points. Consider the Onkyo TX-SR505 ($299) or TX-SR605 ($499), or for small spaces, the value-priced TX-SR304 ($199). The Sony STR-DG810 ($299) or STR-DG910 ($499) are also good choices. (All prices are list, shop the web for better deals). 

Next on the list is a DVD player. However, DVD recorders are so inexpensive that it’s silly not to buy one. Low-end models from Panasonic and Sony can be had for as little as $150. Consider the Panasonic DMR-EZ17K ($149) or Sony RDR-GX255 ($149). They handle all formats (including audio CDs), work fine as players, and are great for letting you archive recorded shows to DVD. 

Of all the decisions involved in your system, speaker choice is the most subjective, but also the most important. Whereas any well-made digital receiver or DVD player does its job, and extra dollars typically buy extra features or ergonomics, higher quality speakers directly enhance your listening experience via richer, wider-range sound. “Satellite” or bookshelf systems often give the best quality per dollar. Though deceptively small, they can produce full-range sound at surprisingly high volumes. One contender is the Boston Acoustics MCS 100 ($499). For a little more money, the Bose Acoustimass 6 Series 3 ($699) provides an excellent audio experience while taking up minimal space.


Jeff Winston - Contributing Writer
Jeff Winston has been writing about home electronics since 1998. An electrical engineer, Jeff has contributed to the development of products in the computer, consumer electronics, and wireless industries. He spends his spare time with his wife, kids, and many PCs, sometimes in that order.



Article Topics
What's Related
Popular Tags
Social Bookmark   less


Comments (20) Most recent displayed first.
Posted by Chuck McKenney  on  03/07/08  at  02:25 PM

Not according to my math.  Try this scenario: Onkyo TX-SR505 ($299), Panasonic DMR-EZ17K ($149), Polk Audio Monitor 50s ($179), Polk Audio CS-1 center speaker ($139) and APC UPS (350 or 500VA, ~$40-$60) for a grand total of $800. Or how about this scenario - Sony STR-DG810 ($299), Sony RDR-GX255 ($149) and Boston Acoustics MCS 100 ($499) and APC UPS (350 or 500VA, ~$40-$60) for a grand total of $990. And there are a few others. Guess you were wrong, Ben.

Posted by JeffW  on  03/07/08  at  02:14 PM

Note that the quoted prices are list.  If you use street prices the $1000 target isn’t so unreasonable.

Posted by Ben Hobbs  on  03/07/08  at  02:00 PM

Strange name for the article considering that almost every combination of the systems you specify comes to more than $1,000.

Also whats up with specifying Bose speakers in such a budget setup, I can’t think of anything I wouldn’t suggest more to someone looking for a great sounding budget system.

If someone were to ask me I’d tell them to spend the money like this;

Blu-Ray Player - $300
Amplifier-$300
Satellites - $200
Subwoofer - $200

Posted by Steve Harbor  on  03/07/08  at  11:04 AM

I seriously doubt that BD player prices will “drop steeply” this year.

Yup, and the format war is going to drag on “for years.”  That was another widely held opinion by the HD DVD camp.

Because we all know new technology consumer prices never trend downward…

Posted by Jeff W  on  03/07/08  at  09:48 AM

Ideally one should try to get 3 HDMI inputs, but it can push some people out of their budget, so some receivers that were worth considering otherwise (but more budget friendly) were also presented.  Whether -you- really need 3 inputs is of course a personal call. 

We can agree to disagree, and I can see that you may think that without the ‘competition’ of HD-DVD, there’s no reason for Blu-Ray to drop.  However, I believe that the steeply increasing volumes that follow the end of a format war will increase competition betwen Blu-Ray manufacturers will push prices way down.

Just my opniion, I could be wrong 8-}


+ View all comments on for this article



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.