Print Email RSS RSS  Share del.icio.us Facebook Twitter
FULL HD 1080p, Everything You Need to Know
Hitachi calls it FULL HD. Sony, Samsung, and Pioneer use FULL HD 1080p. Names aside, we've got the details to make it work for you.
image
As the quality of digital TV improves with technology such as 1080p, the differences are more difficult to discern.
Slideshow
image
View Slideshow

September 10, 2007 | by Rebecca Day

Pity the TV owner whose tube finally blows after 20 years: When she goes into the electronics superstore to replace the set, she’ll be faced with a new generation of shapes and sizes, not to mention a bewildering range of technologies, from plasma to LCD to DLP and SXRD. She’ll see terms that didn’t exist in the analog age, such as HDMI, response time and Full HD. And she’ll gape at a wall of TVs, feeling nothing short of overwhelmed.

She isn’t the only one, of course. Even veteran HDTV owners are perplexed by the numbers and specs coming from zealous marketers. “I feel bad for the consumer,” says Bill Whalen, director of product development for Hitachi. “The marketing machines [cite an array of features and specifications to] try to get some advantage, and unfortunately, that’s to the detriment of consumers, who are confused over what they’re actually getting.”

The latest must-have feature is 1080p. Companies including Sony, Samsung, Pioneer and Sharp use the term “Full HD” to describe TVs with resolutions of 1920 x 1080. “Progressive,” or “p,” refers to the way an image is produced on the screen. A progressive image is delivered in one fell swoop in 1/60th of a second. An interlaced image (as in 1080i) is painted as every other line each 1/30th of a second.

Hitachi uses the term “Full HD” to refer to a resolution of 1920 x 1080, regardless of whether the TV displays the image in interlaced or progressive mode. Whalen notes that most content viewers see what comes to them in the 1080i format and that no broadcast content is available in 1080p. Of the major networks, CBS and NBC broadcast using a 1080i signal, as do HBO and Showtime. ABC, Fox and ESPN broadcast in 720p. Fortunately, all HDTVs convert the various signals to the native scanning format of the television, so you don’t have to worry about the different ways they are broadcast.

The 720p networks chose the progressive format because it does a better job at reproducing motion video for sports, as each picture is painted in one pass. On the other hand, 1080i is better suited to film reproduction, where you want more detail. The best of both worlds? You guessed it: 1080p, which offers the motion benefit of 720p and the resolution benefit of 1080i—roughly 2 million pixels versus 900,000.

So if you took the HDTV plunge early on, is your 1024 x 768 TV (often referred to as 720p) dangerously close to being obsolete? Not at all, says Scott Ramirez, vice president of marketing at Toshiba America. “720p and 1080p are both HD,” he notes. “As always in our industry, you have good, better and best, and you always have the next new thing.” Ramirez says 720p is still a great picture, and people love it, “but now there are things coming out that are even better, and 1080p is one of those.”

Owners of 720p TVs can rest assured that their pictures are still going to look very good,” says Tony Favia, senior product manager of large-screen LCD TVs for Sharp Electronics. “They’re just not going to look as good as they would on a 1080p set. When the time comes to upgrade to a bigger set, they’ll want to strongly think about 1080p, since that’s the direction all manufacturers are headed toward today.”

A 1080p TV is a good choice for larger screen sizes. If you sit too close to a 720p TV, you’ll see the pixel structure of the display, which distracts from the experience. When shopping for TVs, audition models at the distance you would watch from at home. “If you were going to compare a 1080p TV with a 720p in a store, in most cases you’d be looking at a set very close up and not at a typical viewing distance,” says Favia. “When you’re at home, three times the diagonal of the TV is a good viewing distance.”

The shift to 1080p has given TV makers a tiered pricing strategy to help offset the loss of the lower-resolution enhanced definition (ED) format, which has largely disappeared from the market. Pricing free falls have been a boon for consumers, who have reaped the benefits of as much as a 50 percent price drop from one year to the next.



Article Topics
What's Related
Popular Tags
Social Bookmark   less


Comments (14) Most recent displayed first.
Posted by berryjooks  on  09/28/07  at  04:03 PM

You’re info comes from industry execs, hardly an unbiased source.

More importantly, technically there isn’t any such thing as 1080i on a fixed pixel display as fixed pixel displays are inherently progresive.

Unlike tube TV’s, fixed pixel TV’s like Plasma, LCD and DLP are progressive in nature. If you feed it a 1080i signal it converts the interlaced signal to progressive, and shows you 1080p. So with the exception of certain plasma sets by Hitachi and Fujitsu that use ALiS technology, all 1080i capable sets are really outputing a 1080p picture.

So, if you are spending the extra money on a “true 1080p” set the only benefit you will recieve is that your set will not have to upconvert for Blu-Ray or HD-DVD as they are the ONLY 1080p sources. Is that worth the extra $500 or $600 when:

a. Through the miracale of upconversion and fixed pixel technology you already are seeing 1080p on 1080i capable sets.

b. Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are probably destined to become the Betamax of the new millenium. 1080p50 and 1080p60 will be the “next big thing” and current 1080p devices will not be compatible

c. who is clmckenney and why are they pimping your site on all the boston.com message boards?

Posted by martyp  on  09/12/07  at  01:20 AM

All you have to do is look at any wording in s sceane or just onscreen to see the diff

Posted by Sam Wright  on  09/11/07  at  11:05 PM

I have installed a lot of 1080P LCD and Plasma screens.  You really have to hunt for content.  The Blue Ray is probably the best test as long as you are conected via HDMI Ver 1.3 to the screen or AV Router, but it is sure pretty.
I know it is a marketing deal, but I advise my clients to buy the latest and 1080P is it as is LCD’s at 120hz and 4MS refresh rates.

Posted by Joe Sixpack  on  09/11/07  at  09:53 AM

Broadcast of 1080p is irrelevant. For 1080i /60 content, which is de-interlaced for display, and 1080p/24 content on HD DVD and BD, a 1080p display is a better fit - literally. And those who say you can’t see any difference either need glasses or are just parroting what they hear elsewhere.

Posted by Fl_Gulfer  on  09/11/07  at  12:08 AM

I think the guy is trying to convince himself that 1080P is the way to go.  Since no broadcast company has any plans of broadcasting a P signal anytime in the near future, and the only way you will see any difference in a 720 and a 1080p is if the screen is over 42”.  There is a write up in this months Sound & Vision about this subject, and they say the same thing.


+ View all comments on for this article



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.