Illustration credit: Hal Mayforth
It was a slow start out of the gate for both high-definition DVD formats, HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc. But both camps are ready to hit their stride in 2007. The question is whether consumers—distracted by Windows Vista, flat-panel TVs and the next iPod upgrade—will feel the need to leave their old DVD players behind, especially if they are forced to choose between two incompatible formats.
According to Jodi Sally, director of marketing for Toshiba’s digital A/V group, expanding awareness about the next-generation DVD formats is key to the success of either format. “Consumers need to understand that HD DVD is an evolution of DVD, and their current libraries of DVDs do not become obsolete if they buy one,” she says.
Toshiba, the primary backer of HD DVD, brought its first-generation DVD players to market last summer, giving it a half-year lead over most Blu-ray competitors. Toshiba’s second-generation players will be in stores for 2007. The HD-A2 ($499) outputs at 1080i and packs an HDMI 1.2 interface. The flagship HD-XA2 ($999) steps up to 1080p resolution and HDMI 1.3.
Check out the Electronic House Podcast: Blu-ray, HD DVD Format War
Some of the highlights of the HD DVD players include networking and “persistent storage.” The combination of the two offers you the ability to download new HD trailers, audio tracks and features for a given HD DVD title. Every HD DVD player will also be capable of picture-in-picture (PIP), Sally says. Current titles that take advantage of PIP to add immersive experiences include Constantine, Dukes of Hazard, Batman Begins and The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift.
Sally says that between 150 and 200 HD DVD titles should be on store shelves by January. That number could double by summer. On the player side, the RCA HDV5000 HD DVD player ($499) will also carry over to 2007.
Blu-ray Disc product introductions have come more slowly than expected. At press time, Samsung’s BD-P1000 Blu-ray player ($750), the Panasonic DMP-BD10 Blu-ray player ($1,300), and Philips’ BDP9000 Blu-ray player ($900) were in stores and expected to carry over into 2007. Pioneer delayed the launch of its $1,500 Blu-ray player until December.
And after several delays on its BDP-S1 stand-alone Blu-ray player, Sony has now pushed the delivery date to early December, although both of the company’s PlayStation3 players will have Blu-ray drives inside. Published reports at press time speculated that the stand-alone player could be delayed even further as Sony tries to feed holiday demand for PS3.
According to Jeff Goldstein, vice president of the Sony Home Products division, “Sony has been addressing a software function within the BDP-S1 to help meet our expectations. New, advanced technologies take time to develop,” he says.
Why buy the $1,000 player instead of the 20-GB $499 or 60-GB $599 PS3 players? The BDP-S1 will be able to output video at both 1080p/60 frames per second and 1080p/24 frames per second, Goldstein says. The player’s separate audio and video circuitry and an isolated power supply reduce noise. In addition, the construction of the player is sturdier.
Sharp’s DV-BP1 Blu-ray player is slated for the second quarter of 2007. With so many players following the same specs, what will drive purchase decisions other than price and gaming capability? According to Bruce Tripido, senior director of Sharp’s Entertainment Products division, “The core technology that is delivered is inherently the same, but added features, functionality, user interface differences and combo products are ways manufacturers can differentiate their products.”
Goldstein of Sony believes content support from movie studios and the number of hardware makers committed to the Blu-ray format will ultimately make Blu-ray succeed. “With all of the manufacturers entering the market, the studios will ratchet up their output of titles,” he says. The Blu-ray Disc Association reports that 114 titles will be available at the beginning of the year.
Can the two formats coexist in the market? Past history with competing formats, including Beta, VHS and, more recently, SACD and DVD-Audio, suggests the answer is no.
In the meantime, we have two incompatible formats and most movie studios supporting one or the other. That means if you buy a Blu-ray player and want to watch a movie that’s only available on HD DVD, you’re out of luck. We’d love to see players that support both formats, such as we’ve seen with universal DVD players that spin all manner of discs, but last year Samsung and LG backed out of producing hybrid players, and at press time, the only solution was a Windows-based Media Center from a company called VidaBox, with prices starting at $3,500. We can only pray more two-way players will follow.
Agreed, What does Bill Gtes have to do with HD-DVD beside the fact that he is supporting the format and making a player for the 360. Its just not the case. If anything your money is going to go in Microsfots pocket regardless of what format you go with because both BD and HD-DVD are using VC-1 as one of the main codecs it uses for the transfers and MS wons VC-1 and they get money for ever single movie title sold that uses VC-1. MS has thier hands in practically everything and you would be prett hard pressed living a life whereyou werent giving hem at least a little bit ofyour cash. You certainly cant enter into the HD DVD formats and not do so.
As for the formats in themselves, I will never go back to SD. The difference is staggering and I am sorry but on a nice HDTV, Upscaling just doesnt cut it when you compare it to an actual 1080p transfer. Its night and day difference. After watching nothing but HD-DVD’s for about 2 months and then going back to SD I couldnt even believe how bad SDlooked. It almost looked like it was VHS quality after getting used to the HD quality. Anyways I am hooked and with the movies being priced about the same, mostly 19.99 for new releases I just cant do the SD thing anymore.
Anyone who hasnt seen a movie like Batman Begins, Sahara, Aeon Flux, Harry Potter & Goblet of Fire, or the Hulk to name a few in True 1080p HDjust doesnt know what they are missing. It is an absolutly staggering difference between SD and HD and if you love watching movies at home like I do then its a no brainer. Plus the fact that its backwards compatible should make it even more of a no brainer. Worst case scenario, you upgrade to an HD player , keep all your old SD DVD’s and only purchase the new releases on HD. Hell the price of an HD-DVD player right now is likehalf of the price I paid for my first regular SDDVD player.
I wont even get into the other aspects of these formatsincluding much better commentary tracks with IME and of course much better audio ifyou have the systems to take advantage ofit which I do. Batman’s soundtrack in TrueHD must be heard to be believed. It sounds better than a theatre IMO.
Anyways to sum this up, HD is worth it and then some and I guarantee once you start watching alot of either of these formats theharder it will be to go back to SD, even when upconverting. The difference is huge and its even more noticable when going backwards or watching SD after watching alot of HD. The choice is yoiurs and I am sure alot of people wont upgrade. For me it was an easy choice and one that I dont regret for even a nanosecond. HD is all that and then some!!
Later!!
Don, my man, you’re totally right!
Gary, don’t be an idiot. Bill Gates and Microsoft don’t own HD-DVD. They support it because there are less restrictions on the format that were specifically created to hurt the consumer. Sony is pushing Blue-Ray because they have part ownership of the format….Keep your child like hatred of Bill Gates from corrupting your ignorant view point.
I’m a bit tempted by the PS3 but I’ll wait and see if the Bul-ray media sales
numbers shoot past the HD DVD numbers. Other than the differences that are
inherent in the media, the players for both seem to be equivalent in video
quality (yes, I know the Samsung player sucks.) At the moment, because of the
use of Microsoft technology in the HD DVD the start up time includes the boot
of a Microsoft operating system. Some of the various freeze ups and glitches
in the Toshiba player also might be attributable to this OS running under the
hood. I suspect that Toshiba is selling it’s players at a loss just as the
PS3 is being sold at a loss.
Frankly I’ll be a bit sorry if the Blu-ray format faulters because it can hold
more data and its interactive features aren’t tied to Microsoft technology (I
don’t want to see a penny of my money go to Bill Gates.)
This JVC projector offers more onscreen pixels than most, and a THX mode.
DPI, Sunfire and SnapAV deliver high performance at a reasonable price.
Sayonara, set-top box? Or will it just take an energy-saving nap?
It’s hard to imagine life without remote controls, but it’s been a long, strange path to the modern incarnation we know and love today.
All I will say is that I have both formats and my preference is definitely for Blu-Ray, title wise, sound wise and other than the launch titles video quality wise. That all said, HD DVD is still great, but for me comes in at second place