The ultimate 13-plate-speaker surround system?
Can you really make your own “hi-def” speaker for under a buck?
MythBusters challenges a popular YouTube video by “HouseholdHacker,” who shares his expertise with audiophiles facing economic hardships.
He demonstrates how a paper plate, some tin foil, a shiny penny and a mini-jack cable can produce sound that rivals some of the biggest names in loudspeakers.
YouTube fans voted the video as one of the top online myths they wanted to see busted, and the Discovery channel took the mission to heart on the hi-sci show MythBusters. (Spoiler alert: they busted the myth.)
Household Hacker shows us how to build an economical speaker:
Even by YouTube standards, the sound emanating from Hacker’s plate speaker is pretty darn good.
Yet, modest as he is, Hacker apologizes for what may be perceived by audiophiles as somewhat sub-par sound: “Since we’re using only one speaker,” he says, “the audio will not be quite up to par as if you had a 7.1 system.”
Even so, he marvels at his low-cost invention and warns, “Watch out Bose!”
What?! Myth Busted??
The geeks at MythBusters heeded Hacker’s warning by taking plate speakers to the extreme.
A single speaker is for wimps. MythBusters set about to create a 13.2 surround system using the Hacker method.
Even before testing his homemade hi-def speakers, MythBuster’s Tory Belleci bashes Hacker’s claim that the products can be made for only $1. The speaker jacks alone cost $10 each.
Here, however, Belleci misses the point. Hacker suggests of the jacks, “Take it from an old headset or something,” in which case they would be free.
Doesn’t Belleci have 13 old headsets lying around?
In the end, not surprisingly, the MythBuster’s homemade speakers failed to produce sound.
One apparent Hacker follower (or Hacker himself?) was disgusted by the TV show’s flawed results, posting his comments on YouTube:
Hey you wonderfully brilliant people that also happen to be skeptics. I recommend not backing up your skepticism with “if the mythbusters proved its not possible it can’t be done. There a couple things I personally know of that the mythbusters didn’t test correctly and botched up the “myths” From personal experience and testing they are absolutely incorrect on some of their outcomes. So now… please, prove your brilliance comes from watching tv and start cussing me out. for being stupid.
I’m just waiting for Hacker’s second segment on how to make a subwoofer for less than a buck.

I’m all for the drama. It draws the youtubers to an awesome show that they might not have watched otherwise.
In any case, I’ve seen posts by DIYers on A/V forums wondering if this really works because it would be so cool….
(and, wow! A penny warmer for under a buck?!)
I don’t understand why they waste time and effort on an obvious hoax. What a waste of TV airspace! While I usually enjoy the show, the lack of scientific common sense for the sake of drama is sometimes very frustrating. All they succeeded in making was a penny warmer….and at the risk of blowing up their amp!
This JVC projector offers more onscreen pixels than most, and a THX mode.
DPI, Sunfire and SnapAV deliver high performance at a reasonable price.
Sayonara, set-top box? Or will it just take an energy-saving nap?
It’s hard to imagine life without remote controls, but it’s been a long, strange path to the modern incarnation we know and love today.
This is not a hoax. They left out a step and they had too weak a signal. You can build a speaker out of almost anything. Now it will not sound very good nor will it have much volume. He is a working example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YktZQiwtu58