Can you really make your own “hi-def” speaker for under a buck?
MythBusters challenges a popular YouTube video by “HouseholdHacker,” who shares his expertise with audiophiles facing economic hardships.
He demonstrates how a paper plate, some tin foil, a shiny penny and a mini-jack cable can produce sound that rivals some of the biggest names in loudspeakers.
YouTube fans voted the video as one of the top online myths they wanted to see busted, and the Discovery channel took the mission to heart on the hi-sci show MythBusters. (Spoiler alert: they busted the myth.)
Household Hacker shows us how to build an economical speaker:
Even by YouTube standards, the sound emanating from Hacker’s plate speaker is pretty darn good.
Yet, modest as he is, Hacker apologizes for what may be perceived by audiophiles as somewhat sub-par sound: “Since we’re using only one speaker,” he says, “the audio will not be quite up to par as if you had a 7.1 system.”
Even so, he marvels at his low-cost invention and warns, “Watch out Bose!”
What?! Myth Busted??
The geeks at MythBusters heeded Hacker’s warning by taking plate speakers to the extreme.
A single speaker is for wimps. MythBusters set about to create a 13.2 surround system using the Hacker method.
Even before testing his homemade hi-def speakers, MythBuster’s Tory Belleci bashes Hacker’s claim that the products can be made for only $1. The speaker jacks alone cost $10 each.
Here, however, Belleci misses the point. Hacker suggests of the jacks, “Take it from an old headset or something,” in which case they would be free.
Doesn’t Belleci have 13 old headsets lying around?
In the end, not surprisingly, the MythBuster’s homemade speakers failed to produce sound.
One apparent Hacker follower (or Hacker himself?) was disgusted by the TV show’s flawed results, posting his comments on YouTube:
Hey you wonderfully brilliant people that also happen to be skeptics. I recommend not backing up your skepticism with “if the mythbusters proved its not possible it can’t be done. There a couple things I personally know of that the mythbusters didn’t test correctly and botched up the “myths” From personal experience and testing they are absolutely incorrect on some of their outcomes. So now… please, prove your brilliance comes from watching tv and start cussing me out. for being stupid.
I’m just waiting for Hacker’s second segment on how to make a subwoofer for less than a buck.

Thanx u soo much I was gona spend my tim tryna make it work
@mike - you said: “You can build a speaker out of almost anything” you are right. the catch is making it work. You can’t buld a speaker out of anything AND make it work.
I can build a rocket ship out of kleenex boxes.
I can build a human heart out of cowhide.
Will they work - you apparently think so.
“Watch out Bose!” ... HIs words, not mine.
Just more idiotic nonsense from the bowels of somebody’s parents basement. A speaker is just a specialized motor, so you need two magnetic fields to interact. One field come from the audio signal, and the other si usually a constant field, produced by the speakers magnet. Other types of non magnetic transducers also exist, but this pile of nonsense isn’t one of them.
Also, why do you hold Bose up as some sort of standard of sound quality, when all they are is a standard of profitability and markup.
Name:
Email:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?
Please answer the question below:
Type the 3rd letter of the word "woofer":
Electronic House is now available in a digital edition. Learn more.
Well, considering that the drivers in the latest bose sat/sub systems are made of paper, have no crossover, cant produce any frequencies higher than 15 khz, and cost around ten dollars, I don’t think “Better than Bose” really means much.
SIZE DOES MATTER